Health and Wellness
Live life with optimal performance. Share tips on what helps give your mental health clarity, ... View more
Organizer:
- Organized by
-
-
HRC Survey: 92% of US LGBTQ+ Adults Have at Least One COVID-19 Shot
-
HRC Survey: 92% of US LGBTQ+ Adults Have at Least One COVID-19 Shot
HRC Foundation Survey of U.S. LGBTQ+ Adults Shows 92% Have at Least One COVID-19 Shot
https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/hrc-foundation-survey-of-u-s-lgbtq-adults-shows-92-have-at-least-one-covid-19-shot<div>August 12, 2021 – Today, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Foundation, the educational arm of the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) civil rights organization, released new data finding that the vast majority – 92% – of LGBTQ+ adults surveyed in the United States had received at least one vaccination for COVID-19. Supported by The Rockefeller Foundation, this first-of-its-kind LGBTQ+-focused vaccination data is provided through the Community Marketing & Insights’ (CMI) 15th annual LGBTQ Community Survey of over 15,000 LGBTQ+ adult respondents.
Although vaccination rates vary somewhat within the LGBTQ+ community, the rates across race and ethnicity, gender identity and sexual orientation, and age are well above the rates for various general adult populations where the data are available
There are many reasons why LGBTQ+ vaccination rates may be higher than the general population, including higher percentages of the LGBTQ+ community being liberal, living in blue states, and living in urban areas. While participants had strong education levels, those with no more than a high school diploma still had an 87% vaccination rate.
</div>
-
20 Replies
-
Pathetic Sheep.
-
I’m not taking it! I have had three heart attacks and a kidney/pancreas transplant I am not putting my life in danger for that vaccine!
-
You should consult with your doctors to see if taking the vaccine is riskier than not taking it.
I don’t know your medical history and don’t mean to offend, but from your own comments it appears you haven’t made good decisions, haven’t done a good job, taking care of yourself. Maybe it’s time to change that.
-
So… you say you don’t know his medical history and then you go on to lambast him for how his medical history “appears” to you!
-
One problem that holds back idiots is reading comprehension, and OaF is no exception.
As I clearly said: “from [his] own comments it appears” – I also checked out his profile.
-
-
-
-
I would say the sheep are those whose idea of “research” is cherry-picking “data” from already selective sources, never “questioning” those quacks, yet they mindlessly “cast doubt” on what the experts and science says – despite having no counter-data or actual argument.
Indeed, they post an article explaining vaccine hesitancy… yet it doesn’t even mention their “arguments”.
Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Setting
https://realjock.com/groups/news/forum/discussion/safety-of-the-bnt162b2-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-in-a-nationwide-setting“Why Don’t They Believe Us?” – Vaccine Hesistancy
https://realjock.com/groups/news/forum/discussion/why-dont-they-believe-us-vaccine-hesistancy -
HRC has no credibility:
Human Rights Campaign president refuses to resign despite link to Cuomo scandal
They finally DID fire him.
-
Which does nothing to discredit a poll conducted by a 3rd party.
That you’re blowing smoke shows that’s all you’ve got.-
Do you or do you not support the relocation of the American embassy to Jerusalem?
-
-
-
> I would say the sheep are those whose idea of “research”
> is cherry-picking “data” from already selective sources
My idea of “research,” which word I would not render in quotation marks, involves reading the entire literature in a discipline, then distilling it for the general public (and for hacks who constantly misrepresent it).
Tangential to the actual topic: You still have unsafe sex, though, right?
-
You’re alleging that HRC has previously cooked data?
Or you have data (rather than another nothing burger) that this poll result is flawed?Otherwise it appears you have once again reversed the scientific method, choosing to discard data that doesn’t fit your warped “model” while deriving “data” from that “model”.
-
Exhibit A: Professor Wolverine. Clearly several screws loose!
-
How can an organization headed by such an unscrupulous person be trusted?
-
As I suspected, you’ve got nothing that challenges this data (from a 3rd party survey company).
-
As I suspected, you’ve got nothing that challenges this data (from a 3rd party survey company).
Y’all have got nothing but noise. -
ROTFL. You sound completely unhinged.
As I suspected, you’ve got nothing that challenges this data (from a 3rd party survey company).
Y’all have got nothing but noise.
Log in to reply.